Herman Cain Call For Obama Impeachment Over Gay Marriage Irks NOM
By On Top Magazine Staff Published: August 20, 2011
Herman Cain's call for an investigation into President Barack Obama's decision to no longer defend a federal ban on gay marriage has riled the National Organization for Marriage (NOM).
The Republican presidential candidate said during a conference call with reporters last week that the Obama administration's position to no longer defend in court the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), the law that forbids federal agencies from recognizing the legal marriages of gay and lesbian couples, was an impeachable offense.
“I think I've had the chief judgeship from hell,” she told Capitol ...Kathleen Gearin: I know any judge faced with this situation would be frustrated. ...
18 hours ago – “I think I've had the chief judgeship from hell,” she told Capitol ...Kathleen Gearin: I know any judge faced with this situation would be ...
Gearin: 'I've had the chief judgeship from hell' (access required). Posted: 4:07 pm Fri, July 22, 2011. By Jake Grovum Tags: Kathleen Gearin, Mark Dayton, ...
Mar 1, 2008 – This Blogger has for 20 years filed Criminal Complaints against Judge Kathleen Gearin, a single never married, on State SCAP Panel to ...
In a message dated 7/22/2011 6:59:47 P.M. Central Daylight Time, williamwindsor@bellsouth.net writes:
It has been quite a week. After being permanently banned from ever filing a lawsuit in any court anywhere in America for the rest of my life (last week), one might think this week could not possibly top that. Well, you’ll have to “judge” for yourself. This week was just as eventful.
For the first time, I sincerely fear for my life now. I’ll explain why on Sunday’s Online TV Show – 5 to 7 pm EDT on www.Shovio.com
Please tune in. I am saving all the news for then as it will be more exciting.
Folks, the extent of the corruption in America continues to amaze me. I don’t know what in the world we can do!
*Confidentiality Notice. *The Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 119 Sections 2510-2521 et seq., governs distribution of this “Message,” including attachments. The originator intended this Message for the specified recipients only; it may contain the originator’s confidential and proprietary information. The originator hereby notifies unintended recipients that they have received this Message in error, and strictly proscribes their Message review, dissemination, copying, and content-based actions. Recipients-in-error shall notify the originator immediately by e-mail, and delete the original message. Authorized carriers of this message shall expeditiously deliver this Message to intended recipients. See: Quon v. Arch.
Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas has been very busy accepting gifts from organizations that file briefs before the court, attending political fundraisers, ruling on suits in which he or his wife have a conflict of interest, and hiding income. No wonder he hasn't had time to ask a question from the bench in five years.
Ask your U.S. Representative to move to impeach him.
There are three names Clarence Thomas should have in the top of his mind, if there's room:
1. Thomas Porteous. This federal judge was impeached in 2010 for charges of corruption and was removed from office.
2. Samuel Kent. This federal judge was impeached in 2009 for charges of sexual assault and abuse of power. He resigned.
3. Alberto Gonzales. This U.S. Attorney General resigned after Congressman Jay Inslee introduced -- and dozens of his colleagues agreed to cosponsor -- the following bill:
"Resolved, That the Committee on the Judiciary shall investigate fully whether sufficient grounds exist for the House of Representatives to impeach Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney General of the United States, for high crimes and misdemeanors."
It took Gonzales a couple of years to find a job, as lawyers notable primarily for their obedience are not all that hard to find. Inslee, by contrast, is a candidate for Governor of Washington.
What we need to find now is a Congress member who will introduce a similar bill with Thomas' name replacing Gonzales'.
May 16, 2011 – Lori Swanson, Attorney General, St. Paul, Minnesota; andMichael O. Freeman, ... claiming denial of self-representation and improper impeachment by a prior conviction. .... address the error to ensure fairness and the integrity of the judicial proceedings. ...Graham, 371 N.W.2d 204, 208 (Minn.1985). ...
CachedSimilarSTATE OF MINNESOTA. OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS .... However, unlike the procedure applicable in judicial proceedings, the OAH rules governing contested case ...John Graham & Co., 412 F. Supp. 416, 422 (E.D. Wash. ... is calculated to lead to such information, or is sought for purposes of impeachment. ...
Feb 17, 2010 – John Remington Graham 2009 A BILL FOR AN ACT Providing for periodic inquiry by t . ... and misconduct of judicial officers; providing for impeachment of public ... Section 628.61 of Minnesota Statutes shall be amended by ...
To the above named Candidates for St.Paul City Council Please be so informed Affiant Challenges David Thune at 26 Irving Affiant Sharon Scarrella Anderson aka Peterson with Standing since the 1991 City Council Election http://www.angelfire.com/mn3/andersonadvocates/PDFedem2006/file6.pdf
Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas has been very busy accepting gifts from organizations that file briefs before the court, attending political fundraisers, ruling on suits in which he or his wife have a conflict of interest, and hiding income. No wonder he hasn't had time to ask a question from the bench in five years.
