Fri,6Dec2019 To Above Named,Public,City St.paul Kevin where is the Rest of the Story re Quo Warranto, naming Lake Calhoun. Minnesota.
ON the Graves of Sharons Heritage,Soverign Born in Minnesota, must continue her Quest to Quiet Titles to her Realestate, Disparity of Unpublished/Published opinions.
DUMB DFL PARTY,ENDORSEMENTS NOW PUTTING OUR COUNTRY AT RISK4WAR.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division DEVIN G. NUNES Plaintiff, V. CABLE NEWS NETWORK, INC. Defendants. Case No. 3sl9-cv~889 TRIAL BY JURY IS DEMANDED
Complaint for Nunes v. Cable News Network, Inc. :: Justia Dockets & Filings
Complaint for Nunes v. Cable News Network, Inc. :: Justia Dockets & Filings
Fri.6Dec2019 Thank God PRESIDENT TRUMP is a Businessman
Minnesota Local Government Law Attorneys | Minneapolis Education Lawyers | St. Paul, St. Cloud MNWHY
Attorneys - Law Firm Kennedy & Graven, Chartered Attorneys Minneapolis, MinnesotaSHOULD CITY ST.PAUL,MN HIRE OUTSIDE COUNSEL, THEN FIRE ALL CITY ATTORNEYS
| 12/11/2019 |  | 3:30 PM | Council Chambers - 3rd Floor The Library Board will convene during the City Council meeting. | Meeting details |  Agenda |
Wednesday December 11, 2019 - 3:30 PM
City St. Paul,MN MUST also publish all Court Litigation at http://ci.stpaul.mn.us
CONSENT AGENDA
Items listed under the Consent Agenda will be enacted by one motion with no separate
discussion. If discussion on an item is desired, the item will be removed from the Consent
Agenda for separate consideration.
3 RES
19-2122
Appointing Kennedy & Graven, Chartered and Ballard Spahr LLP as
special counsel and authorizing Agreements for Outside Counsel Services
with Kennedy & Graven, Chartered and Ballard Spahr LLP.
Sponsors: Brendmoen
Master Legal Services Agreement - Kennedy & Graven 1-1-2020
Master Legal Services Agreement - Ballard Spahr 1-1-2020
Attachments:
City
Items listed under the Consent Agenda will be enacted by one motion with no separate
discussion. If discussion on an item is desired, the item will be removed from the Consent
Agenda for separate consideration.
3 RES
19-2122
Appointing Kennedy & Graven, Chartered and Ballard Spahr LLP as
special counsel and authorizing Agreements for Outside Counsel Services
with Kennedy & Graven, Chartered and Ballard Spahr LLP.
Sponsors: Brendmoen
Master Legal Services Agreement - Kennedy & Graven 1-1-2020
Master Legal Services Agreement - Ballard Spahr 1-1-2020
Attachments:
City
Sharon with High Regard for the Office of President of the USA and Rule of Law,
must also use the Quo Warranto and Quid Pro Quo to the American People, Election Reforms,exposint Corruption etc.
Waiting to see the Articles of Impeachments based on a 2 minute phone call to Ukraine
Thanks Kevin et al
AFFIANT also Injured via City St. Paul,MN WILL try to educate the Public on the Bad Behavior of current Nat DFL Chair Tom Perez and former VChair Keith Ellison https://www.nationalbcc.org/images/stories/DOJ-St-Paul.pdf
The quid pro quo between the Department of Justice and the City of St. Paul, Minnesota, is largely the result of the machinations of one man: Assistant Attorney General Thomas Perez. Yet the consequences of his actions will negatively affect not only Fredrick Newell and the lowincome residents of St. Paul who he championed. The effects of this quid pro quo will be felt by future whistleblowers who act courageously, and often at great personal risk, to fight fraud and identify waste on behalf of federal taxpayers. The effects of withdrawing Magner will be felt by the minority tenants in St. Paul who, due to the case’s challenge to the City’s housing code, continue to live with rampant rodent infestations and inadequate plumbing. The effects of sacrificing Newell’s case will cost American taxpayers the opportunity to recover up to $200 million and allow St. Paul’s misdeeds to go unpunished. Far more troubling, however, is the fundamental damage that this quid pro quo has done to the rule of law in the United States and to the reputation of the Department of Justice as a fair and impartial arbiter of justice
What you need to know about the Trump impeachment hearings: A quid pro quo and Trump’s defense - ABC News
What you need to know about the Trump impeachment hearings: A quid pro quo and Trump’s defense - ABC News
may be used in the ImpeachmentAs hearings in the impeachment inquiry enter a new phase with the House Judiciary Committee this week, here’s everything you need to know about allegations against President Donald Trump, his defense, and why the phrase “quid pro quo” is dominating the debate:s of President Donald Trump.
Trump can be held accountable for violating the Constitution, even if Congress doesn’t care – ThinkProgress
Trump can be held accountable for violating the Constitution, even if Congress doesn’t care – ThinkProgress
Quo Warranto
"Among legal scholars, there isn’t much debate: President Trump is violating the Constitution.
Impeachment is an unlikely remedy while Republicans maintain an iron grip on Congress and show little interest in holding Trump accountable for anything.
Absent impeachment, the clearest way to hold Trump accountable for violating the Emoluments Clause is through the court system." -ThinkProgress
We the undersigned ask Attorney General of New York Eric Schneiderman, Attorney General of the District of Columbia Karl Racine, Attorney General of California Xavier Becerra and Attorney General of Delaware Mathew Denn:
To exercise their legal authority to bring a Quo Warranto lawsuit against the Trump Organization for being a conduit for illegal activity through it's violation of the Emoluments Clause of the Constitution.
Impeachment is an unlikely remedy while Republicans maintain an iron grip on Congress and show little interest in holding Trump accountable for anything.
Absent impeachment, the clearest way to hold Trump accountable for violating the Emoluments Clause is through the court system." -ThinkProgress
We the undersigned ask Attorney General of New York Eric Schneiderman, Attorney General of the District of Columbia Karl Racine, Attorney General of California Xavier Becerra and Attorney General of Delaware Mathew Denn:
To exercise their legal authority to bring a Quo Warranto lawsuit against the Trump Organization for being a conduit for illegal activity through it's violation of the Emoluments Clause of the Constitution.
- Ch Quo Warranto proceeding can be used to challenge the use of a corporation to funnel illegal emoluments, but also any other illegal activity. In Washington, D.C., Trump appears to have violated his lease with the federal government regarding his new hotel—the GSA lease prohibits federal officials from controlling thange.org
https://www.change.org › new-york-attorney-general-hold-trump-accounta...
State attorneys general have the power to bring actions against corporations, something known as a “Quo Warranto” proceeding, to determine whether the corporations are a conduit for illegal activity. This is known as a corporation acting “ultra vires” or beyond its legal authority. In this case, the proceeding would determine whether Trump’s corporate entities are being used as a conduit for illegal emoluments to Trump
To exercise their legal authority to bring a Quo Warranto lawsuit against the Trump Organization for being a conduit for illegal activity through it's violation of the Emoluments Clause of the Constitution.
Minnesota Supreme Court dives into lake name controversy | MPR News
Minnesota Supreme Court dives into lake name controversy | MPR News
S Y L L A B U S I. A petition for a writ of quo warranto relief based on a governmental agency’s decision may overcome dismissal pursuant to Minn. R. Civ. P. 12.02(e) upon a showing that the decision, even if final, constitutes an ongoing exercise of power.
Kaardal also faced questions about the special avenue he used to get the case to court. He filed it under a special writ that allows citizen actions against perceived government abuse of power.
His clients lost at the district court level but had the case reinstated by the Court of Appeals. Several justices expressed doubts about whether the use of a “writ of quo warranto” applies here.
Greene Espel Law Firm
Greene Espel Law Firm
In litigation now pending before the Minnesota Supreme Court, the state’s solicitor general has argued for the elimination of the quo warranto writ—a common law cause of action to force a government agency to identify the authority for its official actions. In this Minnesota Lawyer article, Greene Espel attorney John Baker comments that the law—including the modern declaratory judgment action—has evolved such that the quo warranto writ is no longer indispensable.
Search Results for “qUO wARRANTO” – Minnesota Lawyer
Supreme Court urged to scrap quo warranto in lake dispute
Posted by: Kevin Featherly on 2019-11-28
The state’s solicitor general wants the state Supreme Court to scrub a Latin phrase — quo warranto — from Minnesota law….
Erick Kaardal, Liz Kramer
June 2011
STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT Case No. AIIII07
TO THE ABOVE NAMED PLEASE INDULDGE SHARON GOING BLIND ATTORNEY PRO SE http://sharon4privateattorneygeneral.blogspot.com
BEFORE I KICK THE BUCKET, CITY ST.PAUL MUST BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE
Fri.6Dec2019 Thank God PRESIDENT TRUMP is a Businessman
Minnesota Local Government Law Attorneys | Minneapolis Education Lawyers | St. Paul, St. Cloud MNWHY
Attorneys - Law Firm Kennedy & Graven, Chartered Attorneys Minneapolis, MinnesotaSHOULD CITY ST.PAUL,M
ERIC BLACK INKCrimes and impeachable offenses: Preet Bharara lays out distinctions
"It’s a political process," Bharara said. "The terms are vague. If a majority of the House say he’s impeached, he's impeached. If two-thirds of the Senate say he’s convicted and removed, he’s removed."
ABOUT THE AUTHOR:
Eric Black
Veteran journalist Eric Black writes Eric Black Ink for MinnPost. His latest award is from the Society of Professional Journalists, which in May 2017 announced he'd won the national Sigma Delta Chi Award for online column writing.N HIRE OUTSIDE COUNSEL, THEN FIRE ALL
Sharon Anderson aka Scarrella 651-776-5835 sharon4anderson@aol.com
LEGAL NOTICE: /s/Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913Pacersa1299 telfx: 651-776-5835:
Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, www.taxthemax.blogspot.com
The Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C.
Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, www.taxthemax.blogspot.com
The Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C.
No comments:
Post a Comment