ImpeachAmyBredmoenSt.PaulCouncilChairHighCrimesMisdemeanorsDataManulipationdba1045VamS;yke

Black Bear Crossing Como park Amys Breech Contract costing Taxpayers over $80,000

  To the AboveMAGNER 

Is this Steve Magner and Ed Smith?

THE MAGGOT 10 NUISANCE UJNSIGN LETTERS THIS WEEK MUST SEIZE ANDE DESIST  N

Magner v. Gallagher - SCOTUSblogamed 30Mar2021,

Magner v. Gallagher

FacebookLinkedInTwitterEmailPrintFriendlyShare

 

Docket No.	Op. Below	Argument	Opinion	Vote	Author	Term
10-1032	8th Cir.	Not Argued	Feb 14, 2012	N/A	N/A	OT 2011

 

Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C. serves as counsel to the respondents in this case.

Issue: (1) Whether disparate impact claims are cognizable under the Fair Housing Act; and, if so (2) what test should be used to analyze them.

Plain English Issue: (1) Whether a lawsuit can be brought for a violation of the Fair Housing Act based on a practice that is not discriminatory on its own, but has a discriminatory effect; and, if so, (2) how should courts determine whether a practice has a discriminatory effect and violates the Act?

Judgment: Dismissed - Rule 14 on February 14, 2012.

SCOTUSblog Coverage

• Fair housing case dismissed (Lyle Denniston, February 10, 2012)
• Petition of the day (Conor McEvily, May 20, 2011)

Briefs and Documents

FacebookLinkedInTwitterEmailPrintFriendlyShare

Merits Briefs for the Petitioners

• Brief for Steve Magner et al.

Amicus Briefs in Support of the Petitioners

• Brief of the International Municipal Lawyers Association et al.
• Brief of the Township of Mount Holly, New Jersey
• Brief of the Pacific Legal Foundation et al.
• Brief of the Independent Community Bankers of America et al.
• Brief of the Eagle Forum Education & Legal Defense Fund, Inc.
• Brief of the American Bankers Association et al. 

Amicus Briefs in Support of Neither Party

• Brief of the United States

Merits Briefs for the Respondents

• Brief of Thomas Gallagher et al.

Amicus Briefs in Support of the Respondents

• Brief of the NAACP Legal Defense & Education Fund
• Brief of the Lawyer’s Committee on Civil Rights et al. 
• Brief of the Housing Advocates, Inc., and Buckeye Community Hope Foundation
• Brief of the National Fair Housing Alliance et al. 
• Brief of the Opportunity Agenda et al. 
• Brief of the ACLU
• Brief of Massachusetts et al.
• Brief of Henry G. Cisneros
• Brief of AARP and Mount Holly Gardens Citizens In Action

 

 

Certiorari-stage documents

• Opinion below (8th Cir.)
• Petition for certiorari
• Brief in opposition of respondents Thomas J. Gallagher et al.
• Petitioners' reply

 

 

 

Tweets by @SCOTUSblog  Follow 10,689 474,227

';SCOTUSblog  @SCOTUSblog ·  

3h 1377246382919147522

 

At 10:00 a.m. EDT, SCOTUS will hear perhaps the most perfectly timed oral argument on whether the NCAA’s rules on student athlete eligibility and compensation violate federal antitrust laws.

@AHoweBlogger’s preview of March Madness at the court.

 

Amid March Madness, antitrust dispute over college athlete compensation comes to the court - SCOTUSblog

This weekend the National Collegiate Athletic Association will host its storied “Final Four” to determine th...

www.scotusblog.com

 Reply on Twitter 1377246382919147522 Retweet on Twitter 137724638291914752252 Like on Twitter 137724638291914752293View on Twitter 1377246382919147522

';SCOTUSblog  @SCOTUSblog ·  

30 Mar 1376895315773640705

 

At 10:00 a.m. EST, the Supreme Court will consider how standing requirements—that is, the legal right to sue—apply to class action lawsuits. Here’s a preview from @AHoweBlogger.

 

Justices return to standing after Spokeo - SCOTUSblog

Nearly five years ago, the Supreme Court decided Spokeo v. Robins, the case of a Virginia man who alleged that ...

www.scotusblog.com

 Reply on Twitter 1376895315773640705 Retweet on Twitter 137689531577364070518 Like on Twitter 137689531577364070531View on Twitter 1376895315773640705

';SCOTUSblog  @SCOTUSblog ·  

29 Mar 1376601196518072324

 

An overview of today’s orders list, including the abortion-related grant, from @AHoweBlogger. https://www.scotusblog.com/2021/03/justices-to-decide-whethe...

SCOTUSblog  @SCOTUSblog

NEW: The Supreme Court agrees to review a case stemming from a challenge to a restrictive Kentucky abortion law. The court indicates it will limit its review to a technical question about whether the state AG should be permitted to intervene in the case to defend the law.

 Reply on Twitter 1376601196518072324 Retweet on Twitter 13766011965180723245 Like on Twitter 137660119651807232419View on Twitter 1376601196518072324

';SCOTUSblog  @SCOTUSblog ·  

29 Mar 1376528652020674567

 

NEW: The Supreme Court agrees to review a case stemming from a challenge to a restrictive Kentucky abortion law. The court indicates it will limit its review to a technical question about whether the state AG should be permitted to intervene in the case to defend the law.

 Reply on Twitter 1376528652020674567 Retweet on Twitter 137652865202067456755 Like on Twitter 1376528652020674567143View on Twitter 1376528652020674567

';SCOTUSblog  @SCOTUSblog ·  

29 Mar 1376521234993795073

 

SCOTUS will release orders at 9:30 a.m. EST.

At 10:00, it will hear a case involving the process of class certification in a securities class action that relies on the “fraud-on-the-market” theory validated in 1988 SCOTUS decision, Basic Inc. v. Levinson.

 

Justices to parse evidentiary rules in securities class actions - SCOTUSblog

The hardest part of summarizing Goldman Sachs Group v. Arkansas Teacher Retirement System is explaining to somebody ...

www.scotusblog.com

 Reply on Twitter 1376521234993795073 Retweet on Twitter 137652123499379507322 Like on Twitter 137652123499379507329View on Twitter 1376521234993795073

';SCOTUSblog  @SCOTUSblog ·  

28 Mar 1376247166604296195

 

While you're watching today's March Madness games, don't forget to cast your vote to decide which former Supreme Court justice should move on to the Final Four in SCOTUS bracketology. The polls close at midnight tonight! Vote here:

 

In Supreme Court March Madness, eight justices remain standing - SCOTUSblog

The first round of SCOTUS bracketology – our unofficial tournament to allow readers to choose the greatest Supreme...

www.scotusblog.com

 Reply on Twitter 1376247166604296195 Retweet on Twitter 137624716660429619512 Like on Twitter 137624716660429619563View on Twitter 1376247166604296195

Load More...

ABOUT
RESOURCES
JOB POSTINGS
PRIVACY POLICY
CONTACT US

Sign up to receive a daily email digest from Feedburner by entering your email.

This website may use cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can

 

 

          Affiant re Penalt6y of Perjury, going Blind must submit Article of Impeachment, vs Amy Bredmoen Council President, Sponsor/Author Excessive Inspections without decending to Particulars dba at 1045 VanSlyke 55103

        full HS Credit,

      Affiant must with Good Faithy, Good samaritan, with Christian, Conservative Good Faith Intent to continue exposing these Woke Liberalism conducting Government Business at Homesteads  Ruling Case Law 

 

City St.Paul_Ponzi Principal

         After decades of Government Officials ignoring Affiant now necessare working on 

 

 

In a message dated 3/4/2021 11:01:59 AM Central Standard Time, sharon4anderson@aol.com writes:

 

             tHURS4Mar2021  TO ABOVENAMED; CRIMINAL ISSUESS INCLUDING MAIL FRAUD,BOGUS BILLINGS,GHOST INSPECTIONS AND CONSPIRACY TO MURDER AFFIANT SHARON A TRUMP SUPPORTER.specifically Black Mayo
Blogger: User Profile: Sharon4Andersonr Melvin Carter,his employees DSI Cervantes,employees Ed Smith, Paula Seely,Executive Branch,City Council Amy Bredmoenivorcee aka Mrs. Jeff Neske aka 2nd husband Mike Hahn Dir Parks and Rec. enbank forensic files 

Data Practices Center

Data Practices Center

52093c14.pdf

 

ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENTS Amy Bredmoes aka Mrs Jeff Neske aka Mrs. Mike Hahn for High Crimes, Misdemeanors, Woke Liberalism, RICO,Data Mismagment,Legislative Overs
Sharons-Fraud Updateight,Ponzi Taxing Schemres in her Official and Personal
Beacon - Ramsey County, MN - Property Tax: 262923220023Capacities as City St. Paul,MN  Council President

dba 

 

 

Sharon Anderson aka Scarrella 651-776-5835 sharon4anderson@aol.com http://sharonsenate64.blogspot.com http://crimes-against-humanity.blogspot.com 

 

http://blogitbabe.blogspot.com    http://sharon4council.blogspot.com

LEGAL NOTICE: /s/Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913Pacersa1299 telfx: 651-776-5835:
Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, www.taxthemax.blogspot.com 
The Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 
Ch.119 Sections 2510-2521 et seq., governs distribution of this "Message," 
including attachments, may contain the originator's
proprietary information. The originator hereby notifies
recipients Message review, dissemination, copying, and content-based 
actions. Authorized carriers of this message 
shall expeditiously deliver this Message to intended recipients.  See: Quon 
v. Arch

 

Data Practices Center

Data Practices Center

52093c14.pdf

 

ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENTS Amy Bredmoes aka Mrs Jeff Neske aka Mrs. Mike Hahn for High Crimes, Misdemeanors, Woke Liberalism, RICO,Data Mismagment,Legislative Overs
Sharons-Fraud Updateight,Ponzi Taxing Schemres in her Official and Personal
Beacon - Ramsey County, MN - Property Tax: 262923220023Capacities as City St. Paul,MN  Council President

dba 

 

 

Sharon Anderson aka Scarrella 651-776-5835 sharon4anderson@aol.com http://sharonsenate64.blogspot.com http://crimes-against-humanity.blogspot.com 

 

http://blogitbabe.blogspot.com    http://sharon4council.blogspot.com

LEGAL NOTICE: /s/Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913Pacersa1299 telfx: 651-776-5835:
Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, www.taxthemax.blogspot.com 
The Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 
Ch.119 Sections 2510-2521 et seq., governs distribution of this "Message," 
including attachments, may contain the originator's
proprietary information. The originator hereby notifies
recipients Message review, dissemination, copying, and content-based 
actions. Authorized carriers of this message 
shall expeditiously deliver this Message to intended recipients.  See: Quon 
v. Arch

 

                                      FORENSIC

                     NOTICE OF OBJECTIONS SINCE 2006 2016,17,18,19,20 rico enterprise UP TO THE Present Jan,Feb,Mar2021,

                       OBJECTIONS/CROSS COMPLAINTS DEFAULT JUDGMENTS IN THE PAST  15 YEARS.

                          AFFIANT re Penalty of Perjury White Christian Trump Supporter, QuiTam Relator State and Allege

                           Sharons Sanctuary on Surrey, Disabled Going Blind due to Stress of Citys refusal to Answer,Abate, Refund is RICO Enterprise techinally

                          WOKE LIBERALISM  Cemetary od  Condemn Housing,Vacant Bldgs in this Blind Bloggin Babe DeahMUST expose this Repeated Pattern causing Death, Disability, Disparagment of Titles contratry to ADA State and Fed Guidlines.

 

undefined
​

Pictures available on March 23, 2006: Best regards from, Sharon***LETTER TO CITY ATTORNEY 4/17/2006 and 4/18/2006 RE: Appeal 4/18/2006, presumed continued Fax: 4/17/2006 | Fax: 4/18/2006 ***Writ of Prohibition 06/06/2006